AG’s dismal record merits dismissal

Malaysianinsider |
Wanted: Attorney-General with ability to marshal strong prosecution team and achieve some degree of success in high-profile cases.

Caveat: present holder of the position need not apply.

The inability of the Attorney-General’s Chambers in even making a prima facie case against Abdul Razak Baginda in the murder trial of Mongolian model Altantuya Shaariibuu is just the latest in a long line of setbacks that Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail has presided over since becoming the country’s top legal officer.

Here is a sampling of his list of shame.

* The Fu Xian Juang murder trial in September 2005, where the three accused were acquitted without defence being called. High Court judge Datuk Abdul Musa said there were clear unresolved doubts and unanswered questions in the prosecution’s case. After a trial lasting 36 days and with 39 prosecution witnesses having given evidence, High Court judge Datuk Kadir Musa found that the prosecution had not brought forward any evidence which could implicate the accused in the murder and that there had been no “prima facie” case made out to warrant the defence being called to answer the charge. The prosecution had apparently omitted to call material witnesses, including the investigating officer for the case.
... selanjutnya.

Bapa Altantuya gesa AG fail rayuan

Bapa Altantuya Shaariibuu, Dr Shaariibuu Setev, telah menghantar surat kepada Peguam Negara, Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail menggesa beliau mengemukakan rayuan terhadap pembebasan penganalisis politik, Abdul Razak. Baginda.

Karpal Singh yang merupakan peguam pemerhati bagi keluarga wanita Mongolia itu, berkata beliau menyerahkan surat itu bagi pihak Dr Shaariibuu, kepada Abdul Gani tengah hari ini.

Katanya beliau turut menghantar surat itu melalui faksimili ke Pejabat Peguam Negara Jumaat lalu.

Mengikut undang-undang, pendakwaan diberi tempoh 14 hari untuk mengemukakan rayuan ke Mahkamah Rayuan. Tempoh itu tamat 17 November, demikian menurut laporan Bernama.... selanjutnya.

Kesian Dr. Sharibuu tak kenal siapa AG ...
Kalau nak tau .. tanya kitorang.

BPR siasat Musa, Gani hari ini

malaysiakini | .... Musa tiba di ibupejabat BPR di Putrajaya pada jam 8.20 pagi. Beliau tersenyum ke arah wartawan sebelum masuk ke pejabat tersebut.

Gani pula tiba pada jam 9.50 pagi.

Selasa lalu, Anwar yang juga ketua umum PKR membuat laporan polis terhadap Musa dan Abdul Gani yang didakwanya mereka bukti dalam perbicaraannya 10 tahun yang lalu.

Pada masa itu, Musa adalah pegawai penyiasat manakala Abdul Gani pula merupaka ketua pendakwaraya kes terhadap Anwar.

Apabila Anwar ditahan pada 20 September 1999, beliau dibawa ke ibupejabat di Bukit Aman di mana mantan timbalan perdana menteri itu dipukul oleh KPN ketika itu, Tan Sri Abdul Rahim Noor, menyebabkan matanya lebam dan mengalami kecederaan lain di badannya.... selanjutnya.

IGP, A-G will be excluded from decision-making in probe, says Nazri

sun2surf | THE Anti-Corruption Agency (ACA)'s probe into allegations against Inspector-General of Police (IGP) Tan Sri Musa Hassan and Attorney-General (A-G) Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail for abuse of power will be conducted with integrity although there may be conflicts of interest.

Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Datuk Seri Nazri Abdul Aziz said the persons directly involved in the case will not participate in the decision-making process.

He said there are two aspects to the A-G, namely the A-G as an individual, and the A-G as an institution which comprises other officials such as the deputy A-G or the solicitor-general.

"The decision whether to prosecute or not will not be decided by the A-G as an individual but will be made by the A-G as an institution. And, because of conflict of interests, surely he (A-G) will not take part.

"So in this case, although conflict of interests may exist, it could still be implemented as there are other officials who can take part in the decision-making process," he said in reply to a supplementary question from Mohd Yusmadi Mohd Yusoff (PKR-Balik Pulau) today.... selanjutnya.

Suruhanjaya siasat Najib, Gani, Anwar

malaysiakini | ... Dalam memorandum yang sama, ketuanya Salahuddin Ayub juga berkata dakwaan itu termasuklah tuduhan liwat terhadap penasihat PKR Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.

"Patik merasa terpanggil untuk meminta supaya satu suruhanjaya siasatan diraja dapat dibentuk untuk membuat penyiasatan terhadap YAB Datuk Seri Mohd Najib Tun Abd Razak dan isterinya, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, Tan Sri Musa Hassan dan Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail dalam aduan-aduan tersebut," katanya, yang menyerahkan memorandum kepada seorang pegawai Istana Negara tengah hari tadi.

Salahuddin, yang juga ahli parlimen Kubang Kerian, memohon agar baginda menitahkan Najib, Musa dan Abdul Gani untuk bercuti daripada jawatan mereka sehingga selesai penyiasatan oleh suruhanjaya tersebut.


Berikut teks lengkap memorandum tersebut:

Seri Paduka Baginda Tuanku,

Dengan hormat dan takzimnya patik merafakkan sembah dan berdoa kehadrat Allah Subhanahu Wataala, mudah-mudahan Seri Paduka Baginda Tuanku dan Seri Paduka Baginda Raja Permaisuri Agong sentiasa berada dalam selamat dan kesejahteraannya.... selanjutnya.

AMK cabar Najib, Musa Hassan dan Gani bersumpah

5 Julai 2008, Kenyataan Media Ketua Angkatan Muda Keadilan Malaysia - Angkatan Muda Keadilan Malaysia (AMK) menyelar tindakan Pemuda Umno yang mencabar Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim untuk bersumpah menafikan penglibatan beliau bersabit dengan tuduhan dangkal ciptaan dan rekaan UMNO sendiri.

AMK tegas berpendirian bahawa ini adalah sebahagian daripada tindakan politik sempit mereka yang kini kelihatan sangat terdesak khususnya di dalam usaha untuk mengalihkan perhatian daripada pelbagai kemelut yang sedang melanda rakyat.

Di dalam konteks perundangan Islam, adalah menjadi satu kewajipan bagi pihak yang mendakwa untuk mengemukakan pembuktian sebelum orang yang didakwa perlu mengangkat sumpah. Dalam keadaan pihak yang mendakwa sehingga kini tidak memberikan sebarang bukti, maka adalah tidak mengikut syariat Islam apabila Dato’ Seri Anwar disaran untuk mengangkat sumpah sedangkan pertuduhan ke atas beliau berniat jahat dan bermotifkan politik.

Dalam hal ini, AMK ingin membuat cabaran terbuka kepada Najib Tun Razak, Musa Hassan, Gani Patail untuk turut bersumpah mengikut prosedur dan syariat Islam bahawa mereka juga tidak terlibat langsung di dalam merekayasa dan menyembunyi bukti-bukti penting semasa siasatan dan perbicaraan yang melibatkan kes pembunuhan mendiang Altantuya Shaariibuu dan juga tidak terlibat di dalam persengkokolan dengan Saiful Bahri di dalam merangka laporan jahat dan fitnah yang mengaibkan Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim.

Najib dan Pemuda Umno jangan sesekali berselindung daripada tanggungjawab untuk menafikan penglibatan Najib di dalam kes ini memandangkan sudah terlalu banyak fakta dan informasi yang dahulunya cuba dikekang oleh institusi penguatkuasaan undang-undang telah pun tersebar ke khalayak melalui pendedahan bukti-bukti baru yang dibentangkan melalui beberapa Akuan Bersumpah oleh Raja Petra Kamaruddin dan juga P. Balasubramaniam.

Shamsul Iskandar Mohd Akin
Ketua Angkatan Muda Keadilan Malaysia

Gantung tugas Gani Patail dan Musa Hassan !!!

3 JULAI 2008

Kepada :

Yang Amat Berhormat,
Datuk Seri Abdullah Bin Haji Ahmad Badawi,
Perdana Menteri Malaysia
Pejabat Perdana Menteri,
Blok Utama,
Bangunan Perdana Putra,
Pusat Pentadbiran Kerajaan Persekutuan
62502 Putrajaya

Yang Amat Berhormat Datuk Seri,

MEMORANDUM MENGGESA KETUA POLIS NEGARA DAN PEGUAM NEGARA DIGANTUNG TUGAS SEMENTARA MENUNGGU SIASATAN KE ATAS LAPORAN POLIS DATO' SERI ANWAR IBRAHIM

Dengan segala hormatnya perkara di atas adalah dirujuk.

1. Angkatan Muda Keadilan Malaysia memandang serius mengenai pendedahan yang di buat oleh Ketua Umum KeADILan yang juga merupakan mantan Timbalan Perdana Menteri, Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim sebagaimana yang terkandung di dalam laporan polis beliau di Ibu Pejabat Polis Kontijen Negeri Selangor pada 1 Julai 2008 yang lepas.

2. Laporan polis beliau yang antara lainnya mendedahkan wujud konspirasi terancang di antara Ketua Polis Negara, Tan Sri Musa Hassan dan juga Peguam Negara, Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail untuk menyembunyikan fakta mengenai serangan terhadap Dato' Seri Anwar dari pengetahuan umum.

3. Ini termasuklah tindakan kedua mereka yang berpakat untuk memalsukan laporan perubatan siasatan kecederaan Dato' Seri Anwar yang menyimpulkan bahawa berlaku serangan fizikal yang serius ke atas beliau, di mana Gani telah bertindak memalsukan laporan perubatan tersebut dengan mengarahkan seorang pegawai perubatan, Dr. Abdul Rahman Yusof untuk menyediakan satu laporan tidak bertarikh yang menafikan wujud serangan fizikal ke atas Dato Seri Anwar.

4. Kenyataan di atas disokong dengan merujuk kepada Para 10 Laporan Polis Dato Seri Anwar:

10. Saya percaya kedua-dua Tan Sri Musa dan Tan Sri Gani Patail secara aktif terlibat dalam menyediakan laporan kedua tidak bertarikh oleh Dr. Abdul Rahman yang telah membuat kesimpulan palsu dan pelik seperti "the pattern and nature of the injuries are not consistent with a direct blow" ["bentuk dan ciri kecederaan adalah tidak konsisten dengan pukulan secara langsung"], "accidental nature of the injuries could not be ruled out" ["kemungkinan kecederaan ini disebabkan oleh kemalangan tidak boleh ditolak"] dan "self-inflicted nature of the injury should be considered" [kemungkinan kecederaan disebabkan perbuatan sendiri harus diberikan pertimbangan"]. Mereka mengarahkan Dr. Abdul Rahman untuk menyediakan lapuran kedua ini dan bertindak di bawah pengarahan dan/atau bersama Tan Sri Mokhtar Abdullah.

5. Pendedahan Dato Seri Anwar ini memberi gambaran jelas betapa bagaimana institusi Jabatan Peguam Negara dan Polis Diraja Malaysia dieksploitasi untuk merencana satu konspirasi politik yang bertujuan untuk menjatuhkan kareer politik Dato' Seri Anwar pada ketika itu.

6. AMK berpendapat ini bukanlah satu perkembangan yang boleh dibiarkan tanpa tindakan susulan yang serius, memandangkan apa yang berlaku jelas membuktikan bahawa rakyat juga terdedah dengan sebarang bentuk manipulasi instrumen penguatkuasaan oleh pihak pemerintah demi melampiaskan matlamat dan cita-cita politik mereka yang mengenepikan nilai-nilai manusiawi dan moral yang tinggi.

7. Intimidasi politik yang dilancarkan ke atas Dato Seri Anwar dan keluarganya sebermula September 1998 hasil daripada pemecatan beliau adalah satu tindakan yang bersifat keterdesakan politik yang tinggi untuk menafikan sebarang bentuk pendedahan rasuah dan salah guna kuasa yang berlegar-legar di kalangan pimpinan kerajaan pada ketika itu.

8. AMK mengalu-alukan jaminan Perdana Menteri untuk laporan polis ini disiasat secara profesional. Justeru, kita menegaskan bahawa akan timbul keraguan terhadap profesionalisme kepolisian sekiranya pihak polis menyiasat laporan terhadap ketua mereka yang masih lagi bertugas dan boleh memberikan arahan. Keraguan yang sama juga timbul terhadap Peguam Negara yang diberi kuasa penuh seperti yang diperuntukkan di dalam Perlembagaan Malaysia untuk melakukan pendakwaan. Pendakwaan yang adil sama sekali tidak akan berlaku sekiranya berlaku pertuduhan terhadap Peguam Negara. Justeru, AMK yakin dan percaya atas prinsip akauntabiliti dan integriti yang tinggi, adalah menjadi tanggungjawab yang sangat besar bagi institusi Perdana Menteri Malaysia untuk menjalankan satu bentuk siasatan rapi dan terperinci bagi memastikan kesahihan laporan tersebut.

9. Ini adalah penting bagi memastikan prinsip keadilan dan kesaksamaan yang dijamin di dalam Perlembagaan Persekutuan dijunjung tinggi tanpa mengenal ideologi politik mana-mana individu, sejajar dengan Perkara 11 Deklarasi Universal Hak Asasi Manusia 1948:

1. Setiap orang yang dituduh dengan kesalahan keseksaan adalah berhak dianggap tidak salah sehingga dibuktikan salah menurut undang-undang di dalam perbicaraan terbuka di mana dia telah diberikan segala jaminan yang perlu untuk pembelaannya.

2. Tiada sesiapa pun boleh diputuskan bersalah atas sebarang kesalahan keseksaan oleh kerana sebarang tindakan atau ketinggalan yang tidak merupakan suatu kesalahan kesiksaan, di sisi undang-undang kebangsaan atau antarabangsa, pada masa ianya dilakukan. Tiada pula boleh dikenakan sebarang hukuman yang lebih berat dari hukuman yang terpakai ketika kesalahan keseksaan itu dilakukan.

10. Sejajar dengan keyakinan atas prinsip ini, maka AMK ingin menggesa kepada Perdana Menteri Malaysia, Dato' Seri Abdullah Haji Ahmad Badawi untuk:

i. mewujudkan satu Suruhanjaya Bebas bagi menyiasat Laporan Polis Dato' Seri Anwar bertarikh 1 Julai 2008;

ii. menggantung tugas Tan Sri Musa Hassan dan Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail bagi menjamin kelicinan penyiasatan yang dijalankan oleh pihak berwajib;

iii. memecat Musa dan Gani serta mendakwa mereka di Mahkamah terbuka sekiranya Laporan ini didapati berasas dan mengemukakan pembuktian yang sahih;

iv. Mendakwa mantan Perdana Menteri, Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad di atas sebarang bentuk arahan dan kebenaran yang diberikan kepada PDRM dan Peguam Negara untuk bertindak zalim menafikan hak Dato' Seri Anwar sebagai seorang rakyat Malaysia yang terjamin hak asasinya di sisi Perlembagaan Persekutuan; dan

v. Memohon maaf secara terbuka kepada Dato' Seri Anwar dan keseluruhan rakyat Malaysia atas salahguna kuasa yang telah dilakukan ke atas beliau.

11. Kami menggesa agar gesaan dan desakan kami dipandang serius, demi memartabatkan akauntabiliti dan integriti negara Malaysia yang tercinta demi menzahirkan prinsip-prinsip keadilan dan kesaksamaan buat semua rakyat Malaysia.

Yang Benar,

SHAMSUL ISKANDAR MOHD AKIN
Ketua Angkatan Muda KeADILan Malaysia

The AG-IGP tag-team fabricated evidence

malaysiatoday - [...] Some of you may by now be blur on what I am talking about so allow me to take you for a trip down memory lane. On the night of 20 September 1998, Anwar Ibrahim was arrested and taken to the Bukit Aman lockup. The then IGP, Rahim Noor, entered the lockup soon after that and beat Anwar up. Anwar was blindfolded and handcuffed when Rahim Noor beat him up.

The recently ‘retired’ Commercial Crime Division Director, Ramli Yusof -- who is currently on trial on trumped-up charges of corruption -- rushed into the lockup when he heard Anwar screaming in pain. He grabbed Rahim Noor and pulled him away to stop him from continuing to assault Anwar.

They then left the lockup with Anwar lying unconscious on the lockup floor, covered in blood and still blindfolded and handcuffed. Ramli suggested that they send Anwar to the hospital but Rahim Noor refused. Instead, Rahim Noor asked them to detain Anwar under the Internal Security Act so that no one can meet him for the next 60 days -- and therefore find out that Anwar had been beaten up.

The next morning, Ramli went to check on Anwar and he found the latter still unconscious and exactly where they had left him the night before -- bloody, blindfolded and handcuffed. Ramli again tried seeking Rahim Noor’s approval to send Anwar to hospital but his plea was declined. Ramli then asked for a doctor to come to Bukit Aman to attend to Anwar.

At first the police said that Anwar had beaten himself up. He not only beat himself up but he continued beating himself even after he had become unconscious. This is the special quality of Anwar who can remain conscious after becoming unconscious compared to Abdullah Ahmad Badawi who is always unconscious whenever he is conscious.

When the government realised that only 1% of Malaysians believed that Anwar beat himself up -- and continued beating himself up after he became unconscious -- they had no choice but to order an investigation. And the investigation confirmed that Rahim Noor had beaten up Anwar and that other senior police officers were also present to witness the beating.

Nevertheless, in spite of everyone in Bukit Aman having knowledge of what happened, the current AG and IGP -- who were both in Bukit Aman at that time and were fully aware that Rahim Noor had beaten Anwar -- fabricated a report that said Anwar was beaten up by a person or persons unknown. Later, of course, Rahim Noor confessed to the crime when he realised he can no longer cover up his evil deed and was sentenced to a mere two months jail, the same jail term for someone who steals a banana. (They let him out after only 40 days).

The AG and IGP fabricated evidence back in 1998 so they must now pay for this crime. No doubt that was ten years ago but the evidence has just surfaced. Yes, that’s right, a whistleblower has just come forward to reveal the secret that he/she has been keeping for the last ten years.... selanjutnya.

Lapuran polis Anwar Ibrahim

1st July, 2008

I, Anwar bin Ibrahim, (NRIC No: 470810-07-5095), hereby make the following police report based on information that I have recently received.

1. This report is in relation to the investigation into the assault on me by the former IGP Tan Sri Rahim Noor on 20 September 1998. I believe Tan Sri Rahim Noor, after being prosecuted, pleaded guilty to the assault. I had lodged a police report in respect of the assault on 27.9.98.

2. In relation to the investigation into the assault, I believe that the Investigating Officer ACP Mat Zain bin Ibrahim (now Datuk Mat Zain) had conducted a thorough investigation and prepared an investigation paper (“IP”) which was presented by October 1998 to the former Attorney General Tan Sri Mokhtar Abdullah and his team which included the current Attorney General Tan Sri Gani Patail for further action.

3. The said investigation paper concluded that Tan Sri Rahim Noor was the perpetrator of the assault on me. The said paper reached a conclusion after a thorough investigation which included medical reports by Hospital KL forensic specialists such as Dr Ab. Halim Haji Mansar and Dr Zahari bin Noor and statement from at least 60 witnesses. The medical reports concluded that the injury inflicted on me was consistent with an assault.

4. Despite the contents of the Investigation paper and the medical reports already available, Tan Sri Mokhtar with the assistance of the current Attorney General Tan Sri Gani Patail then obtained the services of another doctor whom I was informed to be one Dr Abdul Rahman Yusof.

5. Doctor Rahman in an undated and second report speaks of a “reconstruction of the scene” on 14 December 2008. I believe that this so-called reconstruction of the scene never happened.

6. It is an undisputable fact that Dr Rahman’s reports in relation to the assault on me were done without actually even examining me at any time.

7. However, despite the IP and the already existing medical reports, Tan Sri Mokhtar in his press statement of 5 January 1999 appears to accept the views of Dr Rahman on the so-called “inconsistencies” in the other medical reports by the doctors who actually physically examined me.

8. Tan Sri Mokhtar’s press statement also states that the investigation which had been carried out did not identify the person or persons responsible for my injuries. This is inconsistent with the IP which had already concluded by October 1998 that it was Rahim Noor who assaulted me. Tan Sri Mokhtar and his team therefore had wilfully misled the public. As the police investigation done by Mat Zain had apparently not led to any conclusion, there was a public outcry and demand for a Royal Commission which was then set up. Tan Sri Mokhtar also made a false statement that the IP was submitted to him on 19.11.98. I believe that Tan Sri Gani Patail had full knowledge of the false contents of this press statement.

9. I believe Tan Sri Musa Hassan and Tan Sri Gani Patail were present in Bukit Aman on 20 September 1998 and knew about the assault by Tan Sri Rahim Noor on me. Tan Sri Musa and Tan Sri Gani further concealed the fact of the assault on me from the public until my black eye and injuries were revealed in court.

10. I believe both Tan Sri Musa and Tan Sri Gani Patail were actively involved in the procuring of the second undated report by Dr Rahman which makes false and incredible conclusions such as “the pattern and nature of the injuries are not consistent with a direct blow”, “accidental nature of the injuries could not be ruled out” and “self-inflicted nature of the injury should be considered”. They gave the instructions to Dr Rahman to proceed to write this second report and were acting under the direction and/or jointly with Tan Sri Mokhtar Abdullah.

11. These facts show that Tan Sri Musa Hassan, Tan Sri Gani Patail and SAC II Datuk Mat Zain bin Ibrahim (who, according to Dr Rahman’s second report, accompanied him to the cell in Bukit Aman where I was detained and participated in the so-called reconstruction of the scene) conspired with Dr Rahman to procure the production of this second report. This was done so that my police report of 27.9.98 in respect of the assault would be regarded as a false police report for which I could be charged, or at the very least, to damage my credibility, so as to affect my defence in the other criminal cases where I was charged for so-called “corruption” and sodomy to facilitate a conviction.

12. I wish to point out that Tan Sri Gani Patail was the senior prosecutor assisting Tan Sri Mokhtar in the prosecution against me. Tan Sri Musa Hassan was the Investigating Officer for my prosecution. I also believe, that in an unprecedented manner, an operation room specially for my prosecution was set up at Bukit Aman’s compound where all these individuals would meet regularly.

13. This is not the first time that allegations of fabricating evidence had surfaced in connection with Tan Sri Gani Patail. I am informed that in the Federal Court decision Zainur bin Zakaria v Public Prosecutor [2001] 3 MLJ, Steve Shim CJ in delivering his judgment pointed out that “… was he not justified, on a prima facie basis, in complaining that Tan Sri Gani Patail’s conduct at the meeting on 2.10.1998 was an attempt to get Nalla to fabricate evidence in order to perfect charges against him for other alleged sexual offences?” The references to “he” and “him” in that sentence are references to myself.

14. In relation to the above, I refer to the following documents which will be of assistance to the police:

1. The press statement by Tan Sri Mokhtar issued on 5.1.99.

2. The notes of proceedings in the report of the Royal Commission of the evidence of Dr Rahman

3. The second undated report produced by Dr Rahman exhibited in the Royal Commission report.

15. I call for a fresh investigation into the fabrication of evidence in this case which I am advised is an offence contrary to section 192 of the Penal Code punishable up to 7 years imprisonment. I ask that all the persons who are implicated in the procuring of this second report by Dr Rahman i.e. Tan Sri Gani Patail, Tan Sri Musa Hassan, Dr Rahman and Datuk Mat Zain bin Ibrahim be investigated thoroughly so that the truth is known and the offending individuals punished.

ANWAR BIN IBRAHIM

Anwar ups ante with police report against IGP, A-G

malaysianinsider - acing fresh allegations of sodomy, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim will raise the stakes in his fight with the government by lodging a police report today against its police chief and top lawyer for faking evidence against him in a similar case a decade ago.

The opposition leader claims he has proof that Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Musa Hassan and Attorney-General Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail concocted evidence for his corruption and sodomy trials in 1998 and 1999 which kept him imprisoned until he was freed in 2004.

He is due to lodge the report at 2pm at the Shah Alam police station, his Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) officials said. They have painted his 23-year-old accuser as a government plant and a coffeeboy and not a political aide as claimed.

Saiful Bukhari Azlan lodged a police report last Saturday alleging Anwar had sodomised him in a Damansara condominium on June 26 and other occasions abroad. Anwar denies the sodomy complaint and said it was to destroy his political comeback and distract the people about problems blighting the country.... selanjutnya.

Anwar: I have evidence against IGP and AG

sloone - [...] Anwar Ibrahim says he will lodge a police report against the IGP and AG for fabricating lies to put him behind bars 8 years ago.

My friend Dr Raffick Khan says that the recent incident against Anwar Ibrahim is simply to divert attention from the Rosmah-Najib alleged involvement in the Altantuya Shariibuu case. He says if Anwar’s camp starts to “riot” or something to that effect, it may give the government the opportunity to declare an emergency and seize power of the five states lost to the ‘Opposition’. If you want to know more of what he thinks, read him @ Anwar Sodomising Again…?

Just wondering: If he is arrested again, it really looks bad on Najib Tun Razak, doesn’t it? As if he is trying to block Anwar Ibrahim’s fantasy of becoming PM on 16 September. Musa Hassan and Gani Patail, including Najib are great friends of former PM Mahathir Mohammad. So it would look like it was masterminded by Najb. But is it? Isn’t the police directly under PM Abdullah Ahmad Badawi?

June 29, 12.45am (Bangkok time) Anwar Ibrahim has issued a statement on the latest police report lodged against him - that he had sodomised his special assistant Saiful Bahari.... selanjutnya.

Laporan polis hanya rekaan semata-mata - Anwar

malaysiakini - [...] PKR telah menghantar SMS mengatakan bahawa polis telah menahan pembantu Anwar, Saiful Bahari petang semalam dan memaksanya membuat laporan polis yang dia diliwat oleh Anwar.

Ia menambah, polis dijangka menangkap Anwar tidak lama lagi.

Menurut kenyataan itu lagi, Anwar berkata laporan tersebut diatur oleh pihak-pihak yang berkepentingan untuk "menyerangnya" sebagai tindak balas terhadap bukti yang diperolehinya, yang membabitkan Ketua Polis Negara, Tan Sri Musa Hassan dan Peguam Negara, Tan Sri Gani Patail berhubung salahlaku,termasuk mereka bukti dalam kes-kes terhadapnya pada 1998-1999.

Bagaimanapun, tegas Anwar, perbuatan tersebut tidak akan menghalang beliau daripada mendedahkan perkara itu kepada orang ramai.

Tegakkan keadilan

Sehubungan itu, beliau menggesa rakyat Malaysia menentang kuasa tekanan dari pihak kerajaan dalam tempoh beberapa hari dan minggu-minggu yang akan datang.

Anwar berkata, pihaknya menjangka pihak media, badan kehakiman dan pasukan polis akan dikawal oleh pihak eksekutif.... selanjutnya.

People want credible info, doesn't matter from where

malaysianinsider - [...] I find it odd that the government would want to try to "engage" bloggers in cyberspace and in the end to divert resources to this effect.

To accuse the lack of savvy on the government’s part to shape public opinion online is short sighted and will likely end up being counterproductive.

There are many reasons people would think why websites and blogs are getting more popular day by day.

News portals such as The Malaysian Insider and Malaysiakini try to provide alternative news or even angles that are not presented by the mainstream media.

Personal websites or blogs such as Screenshots and Malaysia-Today gained mythical status and its writers turned celebrities because many believed that that have been unfairly roughed up by the authorities.

Others are already superheroes or supervilains in their own right, so when Tun Mahathir, KJ, Chua Soi Lek or Umno’s Mike Tyson blogs, its followers will mainly either regurgitate praises or spew out rabid criticisms. Constructive comments and honest suggestions are usually far and few in between.

But a glaring theme that spreads over all the above reasons why the New Media is popular simply boils down to the fact that the rakyat is crying for alternative points of view and they wish for someone to react, respond or even just to lend an ear to their raving rants and complaints.

The rakyat is sick of one-sided news in the mainstream media and is sick of dissenting voices being muzzled by unnecessary snipping in self-censorship by editors... selanjutnya.

Bila nak tangkap Adnan Mansor!

tranungkite - Tapi kali ini saya hanya mahu mengasak pada Adnan yang begitu teruja dengan siasatan yang dilakukan oleh Peguam Negara, Gani Patail.
Pelik juga. Nama beliau disebut dalam Klip berkenaan. Beliau juga sudah dipanggil oleh Suruhanjaya. Kenapa masih tak ditangkap. Adnan ini wajar ditangkap segera bagi memudahkan soal siasat dilakukan di balik tirai besi. Biar dia rasa sikit pengalaman dilokap, dan disoal siasat macam tahanan lain.

Polis Malaysia harus berani bertindak pada pemimpin Umno. Mereka bukan tuhan, dan mereka juga banyak kesalahan yang harus didedahkan pada rakyat. Apa ada pada Peguam Negara. Kuasa dakwa-dakwi tidak sepatutnya milik dia seorang.

Dia pun dilantik oleh Umno melalui skim ehsan “Kerajaan Barisan Nasional”. Jadi apakah kebebasan beliau sebagai Peguam Negara kini tidak boleh dipersoalkan. Setiap rakyat berhak menuntut keadilan dan Polis wajib menahan Adnan dan tidak membiarkannya diluar sini bersama rakyat yang tidak berdosa. Tempat beliau adalah penjara. Hantar sahaja dia ke sana.... selanjutnya.

Komplot jahat '3 Tan Sri' lacurkan demokrasi

Harakahdaily - [...] Kemudian, hendak dijadikan satu sandiwara yang menarik, maka Pengerusi SPR membatalkan penggunaan dakwat itu empat hari sebelum hari mengundi kerana dua sebab. Pertama kerana keselamatan negara dan kedua kerana Perlembagaan Persekutuan. Soal keselamatan negara ini ditimbulkan kerana terdapat satu unsur sabotaj yang dilakukan oleh beberapa pihak untuk menimbulkan keraguan di kalangan ejen-ejen calon dan petugas SPR mengenai status pengundi itu. Ketua Polis Negara pula mengatakan bahawa pihak polis sedang menjalankan siasatan terhadap empat kes yang melibatkan empat individu yang berlainan. Dua kes berlaku di Perlis, dan yang lainnya berlaku di Kelantan dan Kedah.

Pengerusi SPR dan Peguam Negara juga mendakwa bahawa penggunaan dakwat ini bercanggah dengan Perkara 119 Perlembagaan Persekutuan. Barulah mereka sedar bahawa mengundi adalah hak asasi bagi seseorang pemilih yang telah berdaftar. Jawapan yang mudah dari mulut Pengerusi SPR adalah 'overlooked'! Maka kalau betul-betul ingin melaksanakannya ahli-ahli Parlimen perlu pinda perlembagaan.

Ini yang menarik untuk diperhalusi. Pertamanya, ucapan yang disampaikan oleh Menteri Dalam Negeri danlam Parlimen 14hb Mei yang lalu. Beliau berkata, "sebanyak tiga laporan polis diterima dan tiga kertas siasatan telah dibuka di bawah Seksyen 420 dan Seksyen 511, Kanun Keseksaan". Hasil siasatan polis tiada sebarang tangkapan dibuat dan Peguam Negara mengarahkan untuk menutup kes. Beliau juga tidak mempunyai nama siapakah yang membuat laporan polis tersebut. Jika benar sepertimana yang didakwa kenapa dengan mudah SPR dan KPN membatalkan kaedah ini tanpa penyiasatan yang rapi dan tiada sebarang tangkapan reman yang dibuat dan tidak ada langsung pendedahan mereka yang ditangkap dan sebagainya. Kalau benarlah ia satu tindakan yang boleh menghuru-harakan negara, kenapa tak ditangkap dan dihumban sahaja dalam ISA. Sedangkan ramai lagi di dalam ISA ditangkap kerana didapati terlibat dengan JI dan DI tidak dibicarakan dan meskipun tahanan sendiri mengaku bahawa mereka tidak terlibat! Apatah lagi sebarang bukti pun tidak ada! ... selanjutnya.

Bila Peguam Negara jadi Agen Umno- Barisan Nasional.

bayu06senja
Kita tunggu tindakan Sultan terhadap Gani patail yang Biadap.

Kita seru semua rakyat Malaysia yang menghormati Sultan-sultan Melayu agar menggesa tindakan terhadap Gani diambil. Tidal layak bagi seorang yang menghina Sultan dan merendahkan tugas dan martabat sultan di negara kita terus digelar sebagai Peguam Negara.

sampai hari ini, kalau tak salah saya (kalau salah tolong betulkan).. Gani masih belum pernah pohon maaf di atas kebiadaban beliau kepada Sultan dan institusi Istana.. khususnya di Terengganu..

GANI 4TAHIL HEMPAS FAIL

Peguam Negara Abd Ghani Patail, pada mula sessi sekitar jam 11.00 pagi telah menghempaskan fail dihadapan hakim didalam mahkamah, seolah-olah memberikan isyarat keras kepada hakim.

Rayuan Ikat Jamin Azman & Suwandi ditangguh lagi
Ditulis oleh SM Noor /Buletinonline


(Isteri dan Keluarga Suwandi di pintu mahkamah)

Kuala Terengganu, 13 Jan – Setelah bersidang selama 10 jam, dari jam 10.00 pagi sehingga jam 7.30 malam, Hakim Mahkamah Tinggi, Ahmad Zaidi Ibrahim, Pesuruhjaya Kehakiman Mahkamah Tinggi Malaya, Kuala Terngganu, menangguhkan keputusan Rayuan Ikat Jamin, mangsa tembakan peluru hidup, Insiden Berdarah Batu Burok, Suwandi dan Azman kepada 20hb Januari, 2007.

Peguambela Suwandi dan Azman, Dato’ Wan Mutalib Embong dan Fariz Irwan ketika ditemui sejurus selepas keluar dari pintu mahkamah menyatakan rasa kesal dengan keadaan itu. Peguam Negara Abd Ghani Patail, pada mula sessi sekitar jam 11.00 pagi telah menghempaskan fail dihadapan hakim didalam mahkamah, seolah-olah memberikan isyarat keras kepada hakim. Seorang anggota polis yang berpengalaman dengan selok belok mahkamah memberi komen, sekiranya peguam lain, selain Ghani, pasti telah dihambat keluar oleh hakim. Ini menunjukkan bahawa mahkamah masih lagi dipengaruhi dengan kehadiran peguam negara sebagai pendakwaraya.


(Foto: Dato' Wan Mutalib ketika keluar dari mahkamah malam ini)

Sementara itu, di luar mahkamah seramai lebih dari 30 orang masih setia menunggu dengan sabar sehingga jam 8.00 malam tadi. Sidang “Usul untuk pemohon diberi kebenaran untuk dibebaskan dengan jaminan sementara menunggu proses perbicaraan selesai” pada hari menjadi satu sejarah sebagi sati sidang yang panjang sehingga menjangkaui waktu pejabat dan ditangguhkan pada jam 8.00 malam